ITS THE CONSTITUTION, STUPID: A QUESTION THAT NEVER NEEDED ASKING By Lawson Akhigbe

The Supreme Court’s 6–3 ruling in Trump v. Barbara successfully blocked an executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship. But the real scandal isn’t that Trump tried to delete the Fourteenth Amendment with a memo—it’s that the Court elevated this transparent stunt into an 18-month crisis by agreeing to hear it at all. You cannot amend the Constitution via an executive order or a regular congressional bill; doing so requires the grueling, historic process of Article V. Treating a foundational constitutional right as a casual negotiation opener is political vandalism from the White House, and a "romantic delusion" from a Court that gave the attack a stage. The constitutional wall stood, as it always was going to. The pity is that the judiciary treated the assault on it as a debate worth entertaining, putting the status of 255,000 children a year on trial for pure political theater.

The Cross-Carpeting Clause: A Constitutional Ornament Admiring Itself in the Mirror By Lawson Akhigbe

Godswill Akpabio There is a particular kind of Nigerian comedy that requires no jokes, only a calendar. Take a recent entry: on a Tuesday in late June, the Delta State House of Assembly solemnly declared the seat of Hon. Collins Egbetamah vacant, three months after he left the All Progressives Congress for the Nigeria Democratic …

The Nigerian Prince Who Budgeted Himself Into Government by Lawson Akhigbe

There are two kinds of stories that begin with a Nigerian prince. The first is the familiar one: the email promising millions of dollars trapped in a foreign account if only you would kindly provide your bank details and a modest processing fee. It is the joke that has followed Nigeria around the world for …

I see your 5k, I raise ya

Hit 5,000 steps today and drop your achievement here — we’re cheering you on! Let’s aim for 10k for Diabetes UK, sponsorship accepted https://step.diabetes.org.uk/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=paid-search&utm_campaign=millionsteps&utm_term=brand&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22339487270&gclid=Cj0KCQjw9ZLSBhCcARIsAEhGKgN1a4C-_AvafqTLzjJwXaWwgxdjiy5LD6z8gM56b0LNmBj0pZJkIX0aAsGZEALw_wcB

Lifusprudence: An introduction to a judicial hitman By Chidi Anselm Odinkalu

Lifusprudence: An Introduction to a Judicial Hitman” by Chidi Anselm Odinkalu introduces “Lifusprudence” as the controversial judicial brand of Justice Peter Lifu of Nigeria’s Federal High Court. It contrasts Lifu’s predictable, politically aligned rulings — often accused of disregarding constitutional guardrails, ignoring higher court orders, and inventing convenient interpretations (e.g., the recent political parties de-registration case) — with the legacy of Nigeria’s illustrious judges. The piece portrays Lifu as a dependable “judicial hitman” for ruling party interests, framing his style as a dangerous form of clientelism masquerading as law, especially ahead of elections.