What is a bad, good deal, I am yet to get these details from this Tory government. We leave the EU and then what. The only proposition it seems to me is that the Tory government understanding of the referendum is stopping of movement of people within the common market. Aside from not wanting others to contribute to the making of the rules for the common market, hence the British laws for British people. Under these circumstances what is a good deal and what is a bad deal. We walked away from the existing good deal and we do not want a bad deal. The existing good deal was that for most of the projects from the EU we had opted out with only the pillars of the common market, services, goods and people. The only option on the table is walking away without a deal. That deal is called the worse deal not yet so-called. If we disavow all EU laws and rules then we walk away from the common market (no EEA route). We can continue with the World Trade rules (WTO) as would all other countries. Therefore while all other countries have regional arrangements outside of the WTO rules, we maybe a stand alone WTO rules country. There is an inherent bad deal in such a situation. The Tories have since Thatcher made the UK a financial and services economy. The world does not owe us a living. English language is not trademarked, we have nothing of note that is unique to the world economy. The government commitment to reducing net migration to zero is total evidence of an economy looking to downsizing.
So next time these people whose politics is placed over and above our national interest speak of grades of deals, ask them to explain these deals in English.

